References to “video display units” notwithstanding, many of Plotnik’s essays on editing remain as compelling today as they were thirty years ago. “The editor, not the author, best understands the readership,” he says. “Authors know their subject. Editors specialize in knowing the audience” (page 25).
What’s a good analogy about writers and editors without a reference to fire?
“Communication,” I recently told a class of writers, “is your reason for being—not nourishment of ego, not praise of colleagues, not money, not love of generations to come. You write to communicate to the hearts and minds of others what’s burning inside you—
“And we edit to let the fire show through the smoke.”
Drama aside, I love this.
It is right that the murder of many people be mourned and lamented.
Even the best weapon is an unhappy tool.
What do they do, the singers, tale-writers, dancers, painters, shapers, makers?
Five principles for embracing uncertainty.
Where to give all your precious fucks.
Necessary writing about making a living world. Sign up for free, or become a sustainer.
subscribeOn Always Coming Home and Orality and Literacy
On Virtue Hoarders and The Other Side of Empathy
On The Language of the Night and The Real World of Technology
On The Tombs of Atuan
On Two Cheers for Anarchism
by Ursula K. Le Guin
by Catherine Liu
by Geoff Ryman
by Ursula K. Le Guin
by China Miéville