A series of meandering essays on the subject of the library.
I wonder if the promise of an ebook isn’t the book but the library.
Each reader is but one chapter in the life of a book, and unless he passes his knowledge onto others, it is as if he condemned the book to be buried alive.Manguel, The Library at Night, page 166
I love this. Readers have a responsibility to the text that extends beyond merely reading it; and a book fights for air unless its readers fight to save it.
The Library that wanted to be the storehouse for the memory of the world was not able to secure for us the memory of itself. All we know of it, all that remains of its vastness, its marbles and its scrolls, are its various raisons d’être.Manguel, The Library at Night, page 27
Speaking, of course, on the Library of Alexandria. How many libraries have we lost already? How many more will we lose? Perhaps I should know better, but I have more confidence in the lifespans of the books on my shelves than I do of anything in Google’s vast repository.
In The Library at Night, Manguel muses on a future in which the web’s penchant for forgetting means we lose all connections to the past:
Since electronic technology is present in all our fields of leisure and labour, we think of it as all-reaching, and speak of it as if it were to replace every other technology, including the technology of books. Our future paperless society, defined by Bill Gates in a paper book, is a society without history, since everything on the web is instantly contemporary; for writers, for example, thanks to our word processors, there is no archive of our notes, hesitations, developments and drafts….We no longer record the evolution of our intellectual creations. To a future observer, it will appear that our ideas were born fully developed, like Athena from her father’s brow—except that, since our historical vocabulary will be forgotten, the cliché will mean nothing.Manguel, The Library at Night, page 226
I’ve written of the web’s short-term memory before; what Manguel trips on here is that such forgetting is by design. We designed tools to forget, sometimes intentionally so, but often simply out of carelessness. And we are just as capable of designing systems that remember: the word processor of today may admit no archive, but what of the one we build next?